01
Multiple accounts and fragmented visibility
For teams coordinating cash, balances, and exposures across several banks, entities, or providers.
Business fit
Use cases for companies where finance has become too fragmented to manage manually
Tangibl is built for SMEs that need more than a dashboard: clearer operating visibility, stronger workflows, better decisions, and a credible path toward capital readiness.
Common contexts
Where the operating layer becomes immediately useful.
Each use case starts with practical friction and expands into better reporting, governance, or capital decisions.
02
Multiple asset types and reporting needs
For companies that need a clearer view across cash, financial assets, digital assets, or real-estate-linked exposures.
03
Stronger finance operations without a full CFO department
For lean teams expected to deliver better reporting, follow-up, and decision support without adding heavy internal structure.
04
Governance, investor readiness, and financing flexibility
For companies preparing for more serious shareholder, investor, or capital conversations as they grow.
Self-qualification
Tangibl fits best when complexity is already material.
The strongest fit is not defined by company size alone. It is defined by the financial operating burden.
- Multiple accounts, entities, or financial providers
- Manual reporting, reconciliation, or finance follow-up work
- Growing pressure from founders, shareholders, or investors
- Idle capital or liquidity that needs a better operating framework
Best fit
- SMEs with multiple accounts, providers, or entities
- Teams under increasing reporting and governance pressure
- Businesses thinking earlier about capital readiness
Not a priority fit
- Very small businesses with simple finance operations
- Large corporates already served by heavyweight enterprise stacks
- Speculative crypto-native users without a business finance need